1 John 5:6-10
I didn't used to be
much one for reading commentaries. "I'm only going to read the
Bible," said I. And while that certainly is all you need (God can certainly give even the most
uneducated man or woman clarity when reading the inspired Word), sometimes men
like Warren Wiersbe and Matthew Henry have some wonderful insights to offer
(but never rely on such men above Scripture).
It is in the
following verses that I relied on these two men's interpretation of Scripture
more than I usually do. There are at least four different ways the following
verses have been interpreted, though regardless of how you interpret them, the
same main truth shines forth.
Blood and Water
V.6 - "This is He who came by water and blood -
Jesus Christ; not only by water, but by water and blood."
This verse is the
main discrepancy. It has been interpreted as: 1. Jesus' baptism and
resurrection (Warren Wiersbe), 2. His incarnation, 3. as the water and blood
that flowed from His side on the cross (Matthew Henry) and 4. the baptism of
the believer and the Lord's Supper.
Most scholars agree
with the first, but I am a big fan of Matthew Henry, so I'm going to talk about
both.
In the time of
John's writing, men were teaching that Jesus was an ordinary man whom God had
placed His Spirit upon the cross. According to Wiersbe (and many others),
John's reference to "water" is Jesus' baptism, where God spoke from
Heaven declaring that Jesus was His "beloved Son." This is the first
proof that Jesus was God's Son, not a normal person on whom God had placed His
Spirit.
The blood refers to
the death of Jesus, where God again made a statement about His Son, not
audibly, but through an unnatural darkness that filled Jerusalem along with an
earthquake. God twice made it evident to a crowd that Jesus was the Christ -
the Son of God.
According to Henry,
the water and blood refer to the water and blood which flowed from Jesus' side
when He was stuck with a spear to make sure He was dead. This proves a similar
point, because of the Jewish practice of cleansing themselves from sin through
water and blood (Leviticus 6).
Either way, both
Henry and Wiersbe would agree that the blood and water were a sign that Jesus
was God's Son - the final sacrifice for mankind's sin. Both would agree that
men and women (believers and unbelievers) witnessed these events, and could not
deny what they saw. Even the Roman guard declared, "Truly this was the Son
of God (Matthew 27:54)!"
The Spirit bears
witness. The Spirit witnessed the death and resurrection of Jesus. He convicts
men of sin and convinces them of the resurrection of Jesus.
A quick word about
the Spirit bearing witness. Wouldn't it be nice if we heard God's audible voice
like the crowd did in Luke 3. But the water and blood and Spirit are the
precise reason we do not need an audible voice.
Crowds of people
witnessed the physical proof of Jesus' death and resurrection. They witnessed
God's voice at Jesus' baptism. They witnessed the fantasy-like changing of the
weather upon the death of Jesus and the earthquake that followed. They
witnessed the resurrected Jesus. And now, we have not only the testimony of
those men and women who died for the faith they were so certain of, we have the
Spirit in us confirming this belief.
A threefold cord is
not quickly broken (Ecclesiastes 4:12). Neither is a threefold testimony.
The Spirit
1 John 5:7
The
controversy of this chapter continues in verse 7, where John writes, "For
there are three that bear witness in heaven; the Father, the Word, and the Holy
Spirit; and these three are one."
You may look at your
Bible and say, "Wait a second. My Bible doesn't say that!" In fact,
your verse 7 only says, "For there are three that testify."
That
is because certain version like the ESV, NASB and NIV cut a line out of the
verse, whereas the NKJV and others leave it in. (Side note: you can find many
empty verses in your translation here.) Some of these verses might just have a few words
taken out, but some verses (like Mark 7:16 literally aren't in your Bible. More
on that another time.)
So what happens in a
moment like this, where not only the Bibles vary on wording, but if the verse
should be in the Bible at all?
You compare the
verse to the rest of the Scriptures. Does it agree? What does it say about God?
The verse says that
the Trinity in Heaven bears witness that Jesus is the Savior - who died and
rose again. This agrees with Scripture just dandy.
In 1710, Matthew
Henry spoke up about this verse in his commentary of the Bible.
He said, "It can scarcely be supposed that, when the
apostle is representing the Christian's faith in overcoming the world, and the
foundation it relies upon in adhering to Jesus Christ, he should omit the
supreme testimony that attended him. …The apostle, having told us that the
Spirit that bears witness to Christ is truth, shows us that he is so, by
assuring us that he is in heaven. Here is a trinity of heavenly witnesses, such
as have testified and vouched to the world the authority of the Lord Jesus in
his claims.
Verse 8 discusses the threefold testimony that
is on earth: the Spirit, water and blood. These are wonderful things. The blood
that was shed for us, the washing away of our sin, and (once again) the Spirit,
not only stamping His mark upon our souls, but changing us daily to better
resemble Christ.
However, of what
value are these without verse 7? If Heaven is not in agreement, what matter is
it if earth is? The Three in Heaven must bear witness, or all else is futile.
If the Word brings
the argument before the Father, and the Father denies that is exactly what
happened, what shall we say? If the Spirit approaches the Father and admits
that he was not paying attention, what shall we do?
I don't mean to be
irreverent. Certainly this neither how the Three would interact nor even a
possible scenario. My point is that they MUST be in agreement…and they are.
The Reflection
Have you ever been
to the lake on a gorgeous, sunny windless day? The water sits nearly
motionless, perfectly reflecting the sky and trees.
This is how I view
the witness of Christ. The blue sky, the light puffy cloud and trees stand or
hover above the water and the water perfectly reflects that image, just as the
Three in Heaven bear witness, and that witness is reflected on earth.
We were not created
as creatures meant to constantly be looking upward. If we had been, God would
have designed our necks differently. We were meant to live on this planet and
look straight ahead. The testimony of God is here all around you. You need not
live in a constant state of looking for God.
We do not need to
"invite" God into our worship. Why would He not already be there? The
Spirit is HERE, the testimony is HERE.
Don't spend your
life looking up and waiting to see Jesus. Spend your life looking straight
ahead on earth, waiting for the day when looking straight ahead will mean
looking at the face of Jesus.
George Washington and Jesus
- 9-10
Perhaps in church or
at a conference, you have heard the old line, "There is more evidence of
Jesus' resurrection than of George Washington crossing the Delaware.
Actually, over 500
individuals saw the resurrected Jesus after his death, many more than witnessed
the aforementioned crossing of our first president. So why the fuss over Jesus?
Why do so many
people agree that Washington crossed the Delaware? It's the same reason people
believe in evolution or that man landed on the moon or that the wind exists.
Someone knowledgeable on the subject told them that's what happened, and there
seems to be enough evidence to support it - so they believe it.
We are quick to
believe the experts (although there has been some shift in this mindset since
the boom of social media). So, why do so many not accept the witness of God
which is so much greater?
Is it because it is
so old? I don't think so. We still teach Einstein's Theory of Relativity, we
still hold to Newton's Law of Gravity. So, why do we so quickly dismiss God's
Witness of Jesus Christ?
The witness of God,
though a thing of the past, is still as sufficient for faith as Newton's Law of
Gravity is for stopping an individual from trying to fly off a skyscraper.
However, it would not matter if we had seen the baptism or resurrection of Jesus
with our own eyes. The timeframe does not matter. We are too blind because of
our sin to understand the witness. We are like preschool children. No matter
how many times you explain the theory of relativity, they will not understand.
Without a present
witness to open our eyes, we will forever be blind to the witness of old.
However, when we are indwelt with the Holy Spirit, our eyes are not only opened
to understand the old witness, but we daily receive the witness of Jesus'
resurrection. We are daily confirmed of our faith, because the One who abides
in us is the One who witnessed all things present, past and future.
You need not be
intimidated by those who reject your faith and your resurrected king. You need
only pity them, for they are blind and lost, with no hope outside the sovereign
grace of God.
If you are not
convinced of the witness of God, I would beg of you to fall on your knees, and
ask for an awakening. We were all once dead in our trespasses and sins. But He
has made some of us alive. I pray that you, unbeliever, might be counted among
us.